Chatsworth

Calculated ranking scores by grade and set

Competition Info
Date
August 31, 2025
Location
Chatsworth
Bands / Results
9 bands · 25 results

Competition Results with Calculated Scores

2
1 band
Medley
1 band
Place Band Positions PU Q_P1 Q_P2 Q_D Q_E Q Delta Rating Actions
1 City of Manchester Pipe Band
Manchester, Greater Manchester
P1: 1, P2: -
D: 1, E: -
100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 55.0 0.0 1514.68
3
6 bands 9 results
MSR
6 bands 9 results
Place Band Positions PU Q_P1 Q_P2 Q_D Q_E Q Delta Rating Actions
1 City of Manchester Pipe Band
Manchester, Greater Manchester
P1: 1, P2: -
D: 1, E: -
100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 55.0 6.39 1521.07
2 Ratae Pipe Band
Leicester, Leicestershire
P1: 1, P2: -
D: 2, E: -
93.75 100.0 0.0 93.75 0.0 53.12 5.06 1546.26
3 City of Manchester Pipe Band
Manchester, Greater Manchester
P1: 2, P2: -
D: 1, E: -
87.5 93.75 0.0 100.0 0.0 53.44 6.39 1521.07
4 Ratae Pipe Band
Leicester, Leicestershire
P1: 2, P2: -
D: 2, E: -
81.25 93.75 0.0 93.75 0.0 51.56 5.06 1546.26
5 Reading Scottish Pipe Band
Reading, Berkshire
P1: 3, P2: -
D: 3, E: -
75.0 87.5 0.0 87.5 0.0 48.12 0.55 1479.94
6 Laidlaw Memorial Pipe Band
Banbury, Oxfordshire
P1: 3, P2: -
D: 3, E: -
68.75 87.5 0.0 87.5 0.0 48.12 2.94 1501.95
7 Nottinghamshire Pipes & Drums
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire
P1: 4, P2: -
D: 4, E: -
62.5 81.25 0.0 81.25 0.0 44.69 -5.55 1461.77
8 Nottinghamshire Pipes & Drums
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire
P1: 4, P2: -
D: 4, E: -
56.25 81.25 0.0 81.25 0.0 44.69 -5.55 1461.77
9 Essex Caledonian Pipe Band
Chelmsford, Essex
P1: 5, P2: -
D: 5, E: -
50.0 75.0 0.0 75.0 0.0 41.25 -7.01 1494.74
4A
7 bands
MSR
7 bands
Place Band Positions PU Q_P1 Q_P2 Q_D Q_E Q Delta Rating Actions
1 Ratae Pipe Band
Leicester, Leicestershire
P1: 1, P2: -
D: 1, E: -
100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 55.0 5.06 1546.26
2 Laidlaw Memorial Pipe Band
Banbury, Oxfordshire
P1: 2, P2: -
D: 3, E: -
93.75 93.75 0.0 87.5 0.0 49.69 2.94 1501.95
3 Reading Scottish Pipe Band
Reading, Berkshire
P1: 4, P2: -
D: 2, E: -
87.5 81.25 0.0 93.75 0.0 48.44 0.55 1479.94
4 Beverley & District Pipe Band
Beverley, Yorkshire
P1: 3, P2: -
D: 7, E: -
81.25 87.5 0.0 62.5 0.0 40.62 -3.11 1496.18
5 Nottinghamshire Pipes & Drums
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire
P1: 5, P2: -
D: 6, E: -
75.0 75.0 0.0 68.75 0.0 39.38 -5.55 1461.77
6 City of Plymouth Pipe Band
Plymouth, Devon
P1: 6, P2: -
D: 5, E: -
68.75 68.75 0.0 75.0 0.0 39.69 -8.25 1516.25
7 Essex Caledonian Pipe Band
Chelmsford, Essex
P1: 7, P2: -
D: 4, E: -
62.5 62.5 0.0 81.25 0.0 40.0 -7.01 1494.74
4B
8 bands
March
8 bands
Place Band Positions PU Q_P1 Q_P2 Q_D Q_E Q Delta Rating Actions
1 City of Plymouth Pipe Band
Plymouth, Devon
P1: 1, P2: -
D: 2, E: -
100.0 100.0 0.0 87.5 0.0 51.25 8.03 1524.5
2 Ratae Pipe Band
Leicester, Leicestershire
P1: 2, P2: -
D: 1, E: -
87.5 87.5 0.0 100.0 0.0 51.88 6.78 1541.2
3 Laidlaw Memorial Pipe Band
Banbury, Oxfordshire
P1: 3, P2: -
D: 7, E: -
75.0 75.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 26.25 0.0 1499.02
4 Beverley & District Pipe Band
Beverley, Yorkshire
P1: 4, P2: -
D: 6, E: -
62.5 62.5 0.0 37.5 0.0 26.88 -0.71 1499.29
5 Reading Scottish Pipe Band
Reading, Berkshire
P1: 5, P2: -
D: 4, E: -
50.0 50.0 0.0 62.5 0.0 31.25 0.29 1479.39
6 Nottinghamshire Pipes & Drums
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire
P1: 6, P2: -
D: 5, E: -
37.5 37.5 0.0 50.0 0.0 24.38 -2.15 1467.32
7 Essex Caledonian Pipe Band
Chelmsford, Essex
P1: 8, P2: -
D: 3, E: -
25.0 12.5 0.0 75.0 0.0 25.62 -4.69 1501.75
8 Colchester City Pipe Band
Colchester, Essex
P1: 7, P2: -
D: 8, E: -
12.5 25.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 10.0 -7.55 1480.94
Score Statistics
Highest Delta
8.03
Lowest Delta
-8.25
Bands Scored
9
Grade Distribution
2 1 band
1
3 6 bands
6
4A 7 bands
7
4B 8 bands
8
Scoring Explanation
  • PU (Placing Units): Base score from overall position
  • Q_P1/Q_P2: Qualified piping scores (Piping 1 & 2)
  • Q_D: Qualified drumming score
  • Q_E: Qualified ensemble score
  • Q: Overall qualified score (weighted average)
  • Delta: Rating change for this event
  • Rating: Elo-like rating after this event
  • Scores are calculated using current ranking parameters
  • Higher positions (1st, 2nd, etc.) generate higher scores
  • Piping, drumming, and ensemble outcomes drive rating changes