Woodland Celtic Games & Festival

Calculated ranking scores by grade and set

Competition Info
Date
April 11, 2026
Location
Woodland
Bands / Results
12 bands · 22 results

Competition Results with Calculated Scores

3
4 bands 8 results
MSR
4 bands
Place Band Positions PU Q_P1 Q_P2 Q_D Q_E Q Delta Rating Actions
1 St. Thomas Episcopal School Pipe Band
Houston, Texas
P1: 1, P2: 1
D: 2, E: 1
100.0 100.0 100.0 87.5 100.0 96.25 6.05 1523.35
2 Prince Charles Pipe Band (Gr. 3)
San Rafael, California
P1: 2, P2: 2
D: 1, E: 2
87.5 87.5 87.5 100.0 87.5 91.25 3.68 1526.69
3 City of Angels Pipe Band
Los Angeles, California
P1: 3, P2: 3
D: 4, E: 3
75.0 75.0 75.0 62.5 75.0 71.25 -5.06 1505.84
4 Pasadena Scottish Pipes & Drums (Gr. 3)
Pasadena, California
P1: 3, P2: 4
D: 3, E: 4
62.5 75.0 62.5 75.0 62.5 69.38 -4.37 1458.28
Medley
4 bands
Place Band Positions PU Q_P1 Q_P2 Q_D Q_E Q Delta Rating Actions
1 Prince Charles Pipe Band (Gr. 3)
San Rafael, California
P1: 2, P2: 2
D: 1, E: 1
100.0 90.91 90.91 100.0 100.0 95.45 4.21 1523.01
2 St. Thomas Episcopal School Pipe Band
Houston, Texas
P1: 1, P2: 1
D: 2, E: 2
90.91 100.0 100.0 90.91 90.91 95.45 4.39 1517.3
3 City of Angels Pipe Band
Los Angeles, California
P1: 3, P2: 3
D: 3, E: 3
81.82 81.82 81.82 81.82 81.82 81.82 -3.33 1510.9
4 Pasadena Scottish Pipes & Drums (Gr. 3)
Pasadena, California
P1: 4, P2: 4
D: 4, E: 4
72.73 72.73 72.73 72.73 72.73 72.73 -5.78 1462.65
4
5 bands 9 results
MSR
4 bands
Place Band Positions PU Q_P1 Q_P2 Q_D Q_E Q Delta Rating Actions
1 City of Sacramento Pipe Band (Gr. 4)
Sacramento, California
P1: 1, P2: 1
D: 1, E: 1
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 7.98 1516.42
2 Humboldt Highlanders Pipe Band
Arcata, California
P1: 3, P2: 2
D: 3, E: 2
87.5 75.0 87.5 75.0 87.5 80.62 -0.7 1502.34
3 Jefferson Pipe Band (Gr. 4)
Medford, Oregon
P1: 2, P2: 3
D: 2, E: 3
75.0 87.5 75.0 87.5 75.0 81.88 0.64 1489.44
4 Irish Pipers Band of San Fransisco (Gr. 4)
San Francisco, California
P1: 4, P2: 4
D: 4, E: 4
62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 -8.23 1481.41
Medley
5 bands
Place Band Positions PU Q_P1 Q_P2 Q_D Q_E Q Delta Rating Actions
1 City of Sacramento Pipe Band (Gr. 4)
Sacramento, California
P1: 1, P2: 1
D: 1, E: 1
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 7.64 1508.44
2 Silicon Valley Pipe Band (Gr. 4)
Saratoga, California
P1: 2, P2: 2
D: 2, E: 2
90.91 90.91 90.91 90.91 90.91 90.91 2.21 1492.01
3 Irish Pipers Band of San Fransisco (Gr. 4)
San Francisco, California
P1: 4, P2: 4
D: 3, E: 3
81.82 72.73 72.73 81.82 81.82 77.27 -4.64 1489.64
4 Jefferson Pipe Band (Gr. 4)
Medford, Oregon
P1: 3, P2: 3
D: 4, E: 4
72.73 81.82 81.82 72.73 72.73 77.27 -4.62 1488.8
5 Humboldt Highlanders Pipe Band
Arcata, California
P1: 5, P2: 5
D: 5, E: 5
63.64 63.64 63.64 63.64 63.64 63.64 -10.01 1503.04
5
3 bands 5 results
March
3 bands
Place Band Positions PU Q_P1 Q_P2 Q_D Q_E Q Delta Rating Actions
1 Prince Charles Pipe Band (Gr. 5)
San Rafael, California
P1: 1, P2: 1
D: 1, E: 1
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 9.47 1513.07
2 Irish Pipers Band of San Fransisco (Gr. 5)
San Francisco, California
P1: 2, P2: 2
D: 3, E: 2
66.67 66.67 66.67 33.33 66.67 56.67 -3.21 1505.11
3 Jefferson Pipe Band (Gr. 5)
Medford, Oregon
P1: 3, P2: 3
D: 2, E: 3
33.33 33.33 33.33 66.67 33.33 43.33 -6.26 1482.95
Medley
2 bands
Place Band Positions PU Q_P1 Q_P2 Q_D Q_E Q Delta Rating Actions
1 Jefferson Pipe Band (Gr. 5)
Medford, Oregon
P1: 1, P2: 1
D: 1, E: 1
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 8.18 1491.13
2 Irish Pipers Band of San Fransisco (Gr. 5)
San Francisco, California
P1: 2, P2: 2
D: 2, E: 2
90.91 90.91 90.91 90.91 90.91 90.91 1.75 1506.86
Score Statistics
Highest Delta
9.47
Lowest Delta
-10.01
Bands Scored
12
Grade Distribution
3 4 bands
4
4 5 bands
5
5 3 bands
3
Scoring Explanation
  • PU (Placing Units): Base score from overall position
  • Q_P1/Q_P2: Qualified piping scores (Piping 1 & 2)
  • Q_D: Qualified drumming score
  • Q_E: Qualified ensemble score
  • Q: Overall qualified score (weighted average)
  • Delta: Rating change for this event
  • Rating: Elo-like rating after this event
  • Scores are calculated using current ranking parameters
  • Higher positions (1st, 2nd, etc.) generate higher scores
  • Piping, drumming, and ensemble outcomes drive rating changes